Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Revocation or Denial of US Passport: §7345 US Citizens with Seriously Delinquent Tax Debt

Revocation or Denial of US Passport: §7345)
& US Citizens with “Seriously Delinquent Tax Debt"
New §7345 completely modifies how US citizens living and traveling around the world have to now consider very seriously actions taken by the Internal Revenue Service. It is the IRS, which now holds the power under this new law that requires the US Department of State to revoke or deny to issue a US passport in the first place. US State Department is in charge of the actual suspensions. 
  • In other wordsthe US State Department can revoke, deny or limit passports for anyone the IRS certifies as having a "seriously delinquent tax debt."
§7345 is part of HR 22 – Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, the “FAST Act.”
  • The two new IRS provisions: 
    • Passport Provision
      • Taxpayers with delinquent taxes in excess of $50,000 are potentially subject to having their passports revoked and/or denied unless they get into an agreement to pay the debt. There are many questions about the “due process” that the IRS will use to enforce this provision.
        • As an administrative exception, the State Department can issue a passport in an emergency or for humanitarian reasons, granting special dispensation. 
        • You are still able to travel if your tax debt is being paid in a timely manner, e.g. under a signed Installment Agreement. The rules are not limited to criminal tax cases or where the government thinks you are fleeing a tax debt.
        • In fact, you could have your passport revoked merely because you owe more than $50,000 and the IRS has filed a notice of lien. A $50,000 tax debt including interest and penalties is common, and the IRS files tax liens routinely. It’s the IRS way of putting creditors on notice. 
        • The IRS can file a Notice of Federal Tax Lien after the IRS assesses the liability, sends a Notice and Demand for Payment, and taxpayer fails to pay-in-full within 10 days.
    • Collection Agency Provision.
      • IRS may soon contract with private collection agencies in pursuit of taxpayer delinquent taxes. A monument concern with the IRS proceeding with private collection agencies, is to ensure taxpayers' collection due process rights, and taxpayers' rights to an “affordable” resolution as currently stated in the IRM are observed. An equal concern is the degree to which private collection agents are trained to help the taxpayer arrive at a suitable resolution based on the current IRM, and the many potential failures that could occur as the result of overly aggressive collection activity.
Passport Section Code Provisions:
  • New §7345(e) provides in relevant part as follows: “upon receiving a certification described in §7345 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 from the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State shall not issue a passport to any individual who has a seriously delinquent tax debt described in such section. . . ” [emphasis added].
  • §7345 that provides for a new collection technique—the revocation or denial of a passport to individuals who have past due taxes under certain conditions.
  • The denial or revocation takes place if the IRS sends certification to the State Department that an individual has a “seriously delinquent tax debt.” 
    •  A “seriously delinquent tax debt” exists when there is an unpaid, legally enforceable Federal tax liability of an individual:
      • Which has been assessed;
      • Which is greater than $50,000 (which will be adjusted for inflation in future years); and
      • Either:
        • A notice of lien has been issued and the administrative rights under §6320 have lapsed or
        • A levy has been made §7345(b)(1)
    • However it does not include:
      • A debt being paid in a timely manner under an installment agreement or offer in compromise;
      • A debt for which collection has been suspended
        • Because a due process hearing under §6330 is requested or pending or
        • Innocent spouse relief has been requested under §6015(b), (c), or (f) §7345(b)(2)
  • An affected individual will have a right to challenge either an IRS certification or failure to reverse a certification in either US District Court or the United States Tax Court. §7345(e)
  • §7345. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain tax delinquencies.
    • (a) In general.—If the Secretary receives certification by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that an individual has a seriously delinquent tax debt, the Secretary shall transmit such certification to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport pursuant to section 32101 of the FAST Act.
    • (b) Seriously delinquent tax debt.—
  • (1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘seriously delinquent tax debt’ means an unpaid, legally enforceable Federal tax liability of an individual—
    • (A) which has been assessed,
    • (B) which is greater than $50,000, and
    • (C) with respect to which—
      • (i) a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 with respect to such filing have been exhausted or have lapsed, or
      • (ii) a levy is made pursuant to section 6331.
  • (2) EXCEPTIONS.—Such term shall not include—
    • (A) a debt that is being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement to which the individual is party under section 6159 or 7122, and
    • (B) a debt with respect to which collection is suspended with respect to the individual
      • (i) because a due process hearing under section 6330 is requested or pending, or
      • (ii) because an election under subsection (b) or (c) of section 6015 is made or relief under subsection (f) of such section is requested.
        • Checkpoint summary of all three relevant provisions.
Revocation or denial of passports to certain delinquent taxpayers:
  • Under pre-Act law, Chapter 75 of the Code, “Crimes, Other Offenses, and Forfeitures,” makes no provision for denying or revoking passports on the basis of unpaid taxes.
  • New law. The FAST Act adds a new Code section,§7345, to Chapter 75 of the Code. (Act Sec. 32101) Under §7345, having a “seriously delinquent tax debt” is, unless an exception applies, grounds for denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport, effective January 01, 2016.
    • RIA observation: Passports are handled by the State Department, not IRS. This new provision effectively authorizes disclosure of certain tax information from IRS to the State Department, which in turn will use this information in making passport-related determinations.
  • Except as provided in the next sentence, a seriously delinquent tax debt is an assessed tax debt that exceeds $50,000 and for which a notice of lien has been filed under §6323. A seriously delinquent tax debt does not include a debt for which: there is an agreement in place to repay the debt under §6159 or §7122; or collection is suspended because of a collection due process hearing under §6330 or because innocent spouse relief under §6015(b),§6015(c), or §6015(f) is requested or pending.
  • The $50,000 amount will be adjusted for inflation for calendar years beginning after 2016.
  • The Act provides procedures for, and restrictions on, IRS's disclosure of the return information for purposes of passport revocation, as well as procedures for how an individual who was certified by IRS as having a seriously delinquent tax debt gets that certification reversed (i.e., in the case of an error).
New rules mandating IRS use of private debt collectors:
  • Under pre-Act law, IRS is authorized under §6306 to enter into “qualified tax collection contracts” with private debt collection agencies. This provision permits the use of such companies to locate and contact taxpayers owing outstanding tax liabilities and arrange for payment thereof. There must be an assessment pursuant to §6201 in order for there to be an outstanding tax liability. An assessment is the formal recording of the taxpayer's tax liability that fixes the amount payable. An assessment must be made before the IRS is permitted to commence enforcement actions to collect the amount payable. In general, an assessment is made at the conclusion of all examination and appeals processes within the IRS.
  • There are several steps involved in engaging private debt collection companies, and there are a number of safeguards and taxpayer protections in place.
  • The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, however, included a provision stating that none of the funds made available under it could be used to fund or administer §6306 private tax debt collection activities, and IRS announced in IR 2009-19 that it wouldn't renew its contracts with two private debt collection agencies, having “determined that the work is best done by IRS employees who have more flexibility handling cases, which is particularly important with many taxpayers currently facing economic hardship.”
    • RIA observation: The National Taxpayer Advocate has repeatedly criticized prior efforts to use private debt collectors for unpaid taxes, noting that these programs raise significant taxpayer rights concerns and have repeatedly fallen far short of revenue-raising expectations.
  • New law. The Act adds two new subsections to §6306 (adding new subsections (c) and (d) after the existing (b), and redesignating prior (c) through (f) as (e) through (h), accordingly), both applicable to tax receivables identified by IRS after the enactment date. (Act Sec. 32102)
  • New §6306(c) says that IRS shall enter into one or more qualified tax collection contracts for the collection of all outstanding “inactive tax receivables.” An inactive tax receivable is any outstanding assessment that IRS includes in potentially collectible inventory, if:
    • (i) at any time after assessment, IRS removes the receivable from active inventory for lack of resources or inability to locate the taxpayer;
    • (ii) more than ⅓ of the period of the applicable statute of limitation has lapsed and the receivable hasn't been assigned for collection to any IRS employee; or
    • (iii) for a receivable that has been assigned for collection, over 365 days have passed without interaction with the taxpayer or a third party for purposes of furthering its collection.
      • RIA observation: The use of the word “shall,” typically construed as mandating a certain action, is a significant departure from the present law version of §6306(a), which permits, but doesn't require, IRS action.
  • New §6306(d) renders certain tax receivables ineligible for collection by private collectors, including those that, among other things, are subject to a pending or active offer-in-compromise or installment agreement, are classified as an innocent spouse case, or involve taxpayers that are deceased, under age 18, or identity theft victims.
  • The Act adds §6103(k)(11) to provide procedures and restrictions on the disclosure of return information to qualified tax collection contractors.
Establishment of special compliance personnel program:
  • New law. New §6307 provides that IRS should establish an account for carrying out a program consisting of the hiring, training, and employment of special compliance personnel. Special compliance personnel are individuals employed by IRS as field collection officers or in a similar position, or employed to collect taxes using the automated collection system or an equivalent replacement system. (Act Sec. 32103)
References:
1. Jonathan Bochese, Director of Resolution Services, Tax Defense Network
2. Internal Revenue Code

Virtual Currency

Virtual Currency

Under Notice 2014-21, virtual currency such as Bitcoin is considered property for federal tax purposes; it is recognized as a capital gain or loss on the sale. If virtual currency is received for performing services, your clients would recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the virtual currency.
Newly issued Revenue Ruling 2019-24 established the following rules:
  • Cryptocurrency: A type of virtual currency where the transactions are digitally recorded on a distributed ledger, such as blockchain.
  • Hard fork: A protocol change and results in a permanent diversion. A new cryptocurrency and new distributed ledger are created, in addition to the legacy system. However, the taxpayer does not receive income in a hard fork alone.
  • Airdrop: Cryptocurrency units are dispersed to the distributed ledger addresses of multiple taxpayers. This results in income to taxpayers, since they receive new currency.
Example: Taxpayer owns 100 units of Crypto A. Crypto A experiences a "hard fork" and Crypto B is created. 50 units of Crypto B are "airdropped" to the taxpayer. The taxpayer must report ordinary income equal to the fair market value of Crypto B.
Source: D'Avolio, Mike, CPA, JD, cpapracticeadvisor.com, 12/05/2019

Monday, January 13, 2020

Casualty or Theft Loss, §165(c)(1) of Business Property, §1245

Casualty or Theft Loss, §165(c)(1) of Business Property, §1245
  • The taxpayer (TP) is a BitCoin Miner and lives in New Hampshire. TP owned $150,000 of computer equipment and servers, used for "BitCoin mining". The servers and computers used for BitCoin mining were located in Tennessee and maintained and managed by a registered company with employees owned by a Tennessee resident. The Tennessee owner of the Tennessee company committed larceny and stole all of the $150,000 worth of servers and equipment used in Bitcoin mining from the NH TP. TP has received NO insurance proceeds on the theft. Police reports have been filed with the local authorities and the TP has a lawyer working the case. The TN thief was arrested by local authorities. 
  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), took effect in 2018, greatly reduced the casualty loss deduction for losses to personal property like your home. During 2018 through 2025, only losses to personal property caused by federally declared disasters are deductible.
  • Nevertheless, this limitation does not apply to casualty losses related to business property, such as an office building, business equipment, or a car used for business. 
<>
Hi Stephen,
  • What you’re looking for is right in the Code.
    • IRC §165(h)(5) was added by §11044(a) of the TCJA effective for losses incurred in tax years beginning after 12/31/2017. It provides that in the case of an individual, any “personal casualty loss” isn’t deductible unless it is attributable to a Federally declared disaster.
    • IRC §165(h)(3)(B) defines a “personal casualty loss” as a loss described in IRC §165(c)(3), which is a loss “of property not connected with a trade or business or a transaction entered into profit.” 
    •  A loss incurred in a trade or business is described in IRC §165(c)(1), which is still allowable and need not be attributable to a Federally declared disaster.
David M. Fogel
Certified Public Accountant
1400 Spring Valley Drive
Roseville, CA 95661-7329
Tel. (916) 782-8933
Fax (916) 910-2071
E-mail: dfogel@surewest.net